Log-In Email:    Password:    
  Remember me
Register  |  Forgot Password?  |  Change Password  |  Update Email
Bush's Priorities
Iraq dominates the State of the Union.
by Fred Barnes
01/29/2008 12:00:00 AM

Increase Font Size

 | 

Printer-Friendly

 | 

Email a Friend

 | 

Respond to this article



WE NOW KNOW WHAT is far and away the top priority for George W. Bush in the final year of his presidency. It's not curbing earmarks or strengthening his No Child Left Behind education program. It's Iraq.

The president last night devoted nearly one quarter of his seventh and last State of the Union address to Iraq. This should have been no surprise since the decision to intervene in Iraq stands as his most important as president and is the one on which history will judge his years in the White House.

But in the 24 hours before the speech, the president's aides played up his initiative to cut congressional earmarks by half and eliminate those that haven't been specifically approved in spending bills. This effort is new, though Bush warned Congress against continuing the epidemic of earmarks in last year's address. And that's what usually interests the media--the new stuff.

But earmarks are of symbolic importance more than anything else. Yes, their tab runs to $15 billion or $16 billion a year, a fraction of overall spending. But they symbolize Congress's self-indulgence in packing the federal budget with dubious special projects for a House member's district or a senator's state.

Iraq is a much bigger deal, particularly in Bush's mind. In private meetings and public speeches, he often talks about the benefits of winning the war in Iraq and the consequences of defeat. And he spent time on both of those subjects last night in his nationally televised address to Congress. It lasted

nearly one hour.

The president does not use the words "win" or "victory." To do so would inflame the opponents of the war in Iraq, mostly Democrats, and promise more than may actually be achieved by American forces and their Iraqi allies. This, at least, is what Bush has been told.

But winning is the president's one and only goal. When I interviewed him recently on his decision a year ago to send more troops to Iraq, he said he had never considered any strategy except one that would lead to victory. And he emphasized last night what this decision has produced.

"While the enemy is still dangerous and more work remains, the American and Iraqi surges have achieved results few of us could have imagined just one year ago," he said. The surges he spoke of include not only additional troops, but also a new strategy of protecting Iraqi citizens 24/7.

Bush compared conditions in Iraq "when we met last year" with conditions today: terrorist attacks down, civilian deaths down, sectarian killings down. Militias have been throttled and al Qaeda terrorists captured or killed by the thousands.

"Ladies and gentlemen, some may deny the surge is working, but among the terrorists there is no doubt," Bush said. "Al Qaeda is on the run in Iraq, and this enemy will be defeated." Now, progress means "the surge forces we sent to Iraq are beginning to come home."

Finally, the president urged Congress not to tamper with the success that's been accomplished in Iraq. "Members of Congress," he said, "having come so far and achieved so much, we must not allow" al Qaeda to recover and violence to increase again.



CONTINUED
1 2  Next >
Print This Article

  Beamer: Why'd Obama Recuse Himself on Terror Trials?
Today, 2:26 PM
 
  Skelton: Holder Didn't Really Convince Me
Today, 2:04 PM
 
  Happy Hour Links
Yesterday, 6:21 PM
 
  Obama Awarded a Black Belt in Tae Kwon Do
Yesterday, 5:49 PM
 
   


Search   Subscribe   Subscribers Only   FAQ   Advertise   Store   Newsletter
Contact   About Us   Site Map   Privacy Policy